• To: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Subject: Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
• From: Richard Salz <rsalz@u...>
• Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 13:15:12 -0400
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <1151685765.3816.197.camel@l...>

> I am personally still unconvinced that this is the right way to go and
> still convinced that other more efficient ways of "binding" XML and
> Object can be found either through "untyped bindings" like TreeBind, UML

I wasn't commenting on how good it was, just explaining it was used that 
way.

> Can you elaborate why the fact that RELAX NG uses W3C XML Schema Part 2
> as its more popular datatype library is a problem for data binding?

Sorry for the confusion.  I meant that since vendors have to implement 
part 2, they probably figure "might as well do part 1, while we're at it."

        /r$

--
SOA Appliances
Application Integration Middleware

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>

• References:
  • Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
• Next by Date: Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
• Previous by thread: Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
• Next by thread: Re: Restrictions on existence of attributes?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread