[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Have JDOM / XOM / etc. failed? If so, why?

jdom russian

On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 10:34:01 -0700 (PDT)
Tatu Saloranta <cowtowncoder@y...> wrote:

> ...
> > In most applications, the actual DOM implementation
> > is a second
> Geez. Absolute not! Choosing the API may be secondary
> issue, choosing implementation is anything but.
> Otherwise you might just choose, Electric XML over
> Xerces... or something equally silly.

Why "anything but"? If practice show that choice is silly, the
implementation can be replaced.

> -+ Tatu +-

Oleg Parashchenko  olpa@ http://xmlhack.ru/  XML news in Russian
http://uucode.com/blog/  Generative Programming, XML, TeX, Scheme


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.