• To: Michael Champion <michael.champion@h...>
• Subject: Re: W3C Launches Incubator Activity
• From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
• Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:12:45 -0500
• Cc: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <BAY114-W2C482229C58E184163E6399020@p...>
• References: <BAY114-W2C482229C58E184163E6399020@p...>
• User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 11:08:18AM -0800, Michael Champion wrote:
> At the risk of drawing flames ... arguably the EXI WG really should
> have been an XG.   The (internal W3C discussion) pushback on that
> suggestion was that the research is done and now its time to
> standardize.  We shall see of course.

The Binary Characterization WG probably would have been am XG if
the process had been ready.

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/ * http://fromoldbooks.org/

• References:
  • RE: Re: W3C Launches Incubator Activity
    • From: "Michael Champion" <michael.champion@h...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Re: W3C Launches Incubator Activity
• Next by Date: Re: W3C Launches Incubator Activity
• Previous by thread: RE: Re: W3C Launches Incubator Activity
• Next by thread: Re: W3C Launches Incubator Activity
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread