[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Did Documents Win? No. Objects Just Couldn't GetTheir A

• To: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Subject: RE: Did Documents Win? No. Objects Just Couldn't GetTheir ActTogether.
• From: Richard Salz <rsalz@u...>
• Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 00:23:21 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE0BB1FEDF@h...>

> Why Federated instead of Confederated?  In other words, if 
> REST is Federated naming, you are saying it is centrally 
> administered.

That's just what the term was.  The federation may be as loose as the 
(virtual) wire that connects them.

        /r$

-- 
SOA Appliance Group
IBM Application Integration Middleware

• References:
  • RE: Did Documents Win? No. Objects Just Couldn't GetTheir Act Together.
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <len.bullard@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Did Documents Win? No. Objects Just Couldn't GetTheir Act Together.
• Next by Date: XML Fragments
• Previous by thread: RE: Did Documents Win? No. Objects Just Couldn't GetTheir Act Together.
• Next by thread: RE: Did Documents Win? No. Objects Just Couldn't GetTheir Act Together.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread