• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Subject: Re: xml xsl web architecture
• From: "Peter Hunsberger" <peter.hunsberger@g...>
• Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:23:05 -0600
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=QKsPGopzljmj3R07ZI8GcTWSb6JhbGrPUqZRRg/emdyOToci6f0lRItS5SdCPqV2ImQgfuYczrOydGFBHai6Mxr4pSnGbF9LT0+9VTFhjZQUcJ9A8Zrhir9J0DKtqAAv7eHUj5Fbq0gErRJKrgOYGb5HYKPLNHOK6t6V1Aifj9w=
• In-reply-to: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE0BB1FEF8@h...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE0BB1FEF8@h...>

On 2/27/06, Bullard, Claude L (Len) <len.bullard@i...> wrote:
> Would XML schemata be more powerful if they included a formal record of
> their failures in transactions?
>
> How would one represent that?
>
> Does that intersect with XSL that operates over the schema-scoped instances?
>

Huh ?   (What does this have to do with the question at hand?)

--
Peter Hunsberger

• References:
  • RE: xml xsl web architecture
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: xml xsl web architecture
• Next by Date: RE: xml xsl web architecture
• Previous by thread: RE: xml xsl web architecture
• Next by thread: RE: xml xsl web architecture
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread