|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: The order of attributes
My guess is (and I wasn't there) is that it added complexity and duplicated features in the tree. SGML is complicated enough without adding yet another feature that isn't useful in a large number of cases. However, turning this on the head a bit, if XML was to be a simplified SGML, why would we have added features that are not very useful in a large number of cases? Keep in mind, SGML had to be modified slightly to make XML a proper subset so it is conceivable that something along this line could have been added. Again was it 'very useful in a large number of cases' where those cases did not include all of the things to which XML has been applied in the aftermath that the right people considered important then. Only a few wild and crazy people thought XML would become the lingua franca for all bits on the wire. len From: ian.graham@u... [mailto:ian.graham@u...] Quoting "DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)" <bob.ducharme@l...>: > I think the general idea is that if the ordering of pieces of > information associated with an element matter to an application, then > they should be declared in the content model as child elements, where > you have various regular-expression-like options for describing ordering > options. I agree with this interpretation, but it does not explain _why_ attribute order is explicitly not relevant.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








