[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XFORMS

• To: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>
• Subject: Re: XFORMS
• From: Carlo Innocenti <minollo@m...>
• Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:43:01 -0500
• Cc: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <43DF72D4.50503@m...>
• References: <BAY103-F220CD3EEBAC2CF1188215CA6080@p...><43DF72D4.50503@m...>

Have you looked at formsPlayer?
   http://www.formsplayer.com/content/index.html

Minollo
http://www.stylusstudio.com


At 09:23 AM 1/31/2006, Elliotte Harold wrote:
>Fraser Goffin wrote:
>>As Mike says there are a number of successful 'server-side' 
>>implementations in use (we use one in an industry portal), but IMO 
>>it is unlikely to gain much traction client-side (can't see MS 
>>supporting it since they have their own solution to this and IE 
>>usage remains 90%+ commercially).
>
>As I've said before, that's irrelevant. If there's a good, free 
>client side implementation that is better than the alternatives for 
>developing web apps, some intranets will use it. It can grow from 
>there to take over the market. This has happened before. This is 
>*exactly* how IE and AJAX got into the position they're in today.
>
>Of course, this only works if there actually is a good client side 
>implementation bundled with a browser that lets developers do things 
>they can't easily do today with alternative technologies.

• References:
  • RE: XFORMS
    • From: "Fraser Goffin" <goffinf@h...>
  • Re: XFORMS
    • From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XSLT Unit Tester
• Next by Date: Re: XFORMS
• Previous by thread: Re: XFORMS
• Next by thread: RE: XFORMS
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread