[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: abstract types

• To: David Nedrow <listbox@n...>
• Subject: Re: abstract types
• From: ht@m... (Henry S. Thompson)
• Date: 18 Nov 2005 18:48:33 +0000
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <DCFACB9B-F0A4-4C4A-8E6D-4A671E9726C8@n...>
• References: <DCFACB9B-F0A4-4C4A-8E6D-4A671E9726C8@n...>
• Sender: ht@p...
• User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley)

David Nedrow <listbox@n...> writes:

> I'm creating a number of base data types. I can't make a simpleType
> 'abstract'.  Am I correct that I'll need to convert the below to a
> complexType?

Yes.

ht
-- 
               Henry S. Thompson, Markup Technology Ltd.
     4 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- +44 (0) 7866 471 388
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@m...
                  URL: http://www.markup.co.uk/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]

• References:
  • abstract types
    • From: David Nedrow <listbox@n...>

• Prev by Date: Schema issue with enumerated element content
• Next by Date: Re: Schema issue with enumerated element content
• Previous by thread: abstract types
• Next by thread: weird namespace issue with heirarchy of substitution groups.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread