[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Optional elements and restrictions


restrictions with elements in xml
.

 

I am hearing that it is best practice to allow both scenarios – the “empty element” and the “omitted element” – in documents that are provided.  

 

 

I don't think there is any consensus on this.

 

My own preference is to model absent or not-applicable data by omitting the relevant element or attribute, using elements/attributes that exist but have an empty string as their value only for cases where this has some real meaning.

 

There is of course a third way to represent absent information, namely to use the xsi:nil attribute, but I've never met anyone who thinks that is a good idea.

 

Michael Kay

http://www.saxonica.com/


PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.