[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML Schemas

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: XML Schemas
• From: Richard Lainchbury <freexe@g...>
• Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 16:11:11 +0100
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ef9s4BRLV0X+PIRZNs+4mXBx8zDQ3So9CCrD746I+YagOZWWc0cOEjDpZ5aOePbPnvEVLCagTdFJFTTiEpqe6VHRNSDm2gEPFTL1b6i8b/3TBx9Ihxi/JYCs+zlO69bYVes7PHo07hqYg98dKXCMB8srmUkHcqg5r4Yb8Thculc=
• In-reply-to: <f5b7jbzhy4d.fsf@e...>
• References: <2cbc8d0a0510270234g65af59c7t@m...> <f5b7jbzhy4d.fsf@e...>

Does that mean that you would never beable to write a schema for xhtml?

If I write the extra rules in the annotations element with schematron
is it likely to be intergrated into the w3 spec at some point in the
future?

Thanks David and Henry for your answers


Richard

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: XML Schemas
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: XML Schemas
    • From: ht@i... (Henry S. Thompson)

• References:
  • XML Schemas
    • From: Richard Lainchbury <freexe@g...>
  • Re: XML Schemas
    • From: ht@i... (Henry S. Thompson)

• Prev by Date: Re: Default Entity when compose xml file
• Next by Date: Re: XML Schemas
• Previous by thread: Re: XML Schemas
• Next by thread: Re: XML Schemas
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread