|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: HELP Needed in XPATH.
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 02:33:04PM +0200, Eric van der Vlist wrote: > Le mardi 27 septembre 2005 ? 14:15 +0200, Jens Stavnstrup a ?crit : [...] >> Except that statement is not correct, but remain there for historical >> reasons. > > Hmmm... This statement is in a page updated 2005/08/26 by Liam Quin and > I'd expect it to be accurate ! You are too kind :-) >> XPath was originally part of XSL, but was separated a long time ago. >> So XSL consists only of two documents (at least the 1.0 version). > > I don't think so several reasons: > > * Until XSLT 2.0 and XPath 2.0 (if that's what you're referring > to) become recommendations, the only rock solid specs on which > one should rely are XSLT 1.0 and XPath 1.0 and they definitely > describe themselves as part of the XSL family of specs. Correct. > * If you consider that XPath 2.0 has moved along to new areas with > the XQuery 1.0 spec, you should also consider that XSLT 2.0 has > done the same "migration" and XSL should be for you only one > document (and not two). XSLT 2.0 still depends on XPath, this time on XPath 2.0. > Furthermore, my answer is and will remain relevant in the context of a > question asking how XPath is related to XSL-FO! Right :-) Liam -- Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/ Words and Pictures from Old Books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








