|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Binary XML Permathread, iteration N+1 - was Re:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:07:31 -0700, Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@g...> wrote: > On 8/26/05, Rich Salz <rsalz@d...> wrote: >> > the major use cases? I'm keeping an open mind on that, but I fear >> > that many major stakeholders want a different 20%. >> >> Which, according to conventional wisdom, is how/why XSD is what it is. >> And there seems to be consensus to "do better." Yet, as Liam observed >> at the members meeting back in February, who else should do this but >> W3C? >> >> It's going to be very hard. Irresistable forces create intractable >> standards. :) >> > > If only we had an immovable object or two for these forces to run > into.... Intractable standards = immovable forces??? -- .:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:._.:||:. Nathan Young A: ncy1717 E: natyoung@c...
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








