[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?

• To: "Bullard, Claude L \(Len\)" <len.bullard@i...>, "Doug Rudder" <drudder@d...>, "Alan Gutierrez" <alan-xml-dev@e...>
• Subject: RE: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>
• Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 10:08:42 -0400
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• Thread-index: AcWfRw4K/83vRSHCR+ibLXS9MM5ATQAADhaQ
• Thread-topic: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?

Recent news from W3C: "XML Query Test Suite Released":

http://www.w3.org/XML/Query/test-suite/

Thoughts?
:)

Kind Regards,
Joseph Chiusano
Booz Allen Hamilton
O: 703-902-6923
C: 202-251-0731
Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:len.bullard@i...] 
> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 10:01 AM
> To: 'Doug Rudder'; 'Alan Gutierrez'
> Cc: xml-dev@l...
> Subject: RE:  Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
> 
> Fine.  Let them come to your schools.  Not mine. 
> I love my children too much to give in to the sophistry of 
> the boobs who want to pervert their minds to satisfy their 
> lust for power.
> 
> There is no debate, Doug.  It's not science.  It's religion.  
> Teach it in a comparative religion class with other 
> faith-based theories of creation, and I've no problem with 
> such electives.  Teach it as science and you are committing a 
> crime against humanity.  
> 
> Don't make apologies for me.  I post that with no 
> reservations or hesitation.
> 
> len
> 
> 
> From: Doug Rudder [mailto:drudder@d...]
> 
> This is the single most offensive post I've ever read (which 
> is a shame since it comes from someone I've always respected). 
> 
> One can make (and many scientists have made) a solid, 
> logical, and truly scientific argument that evolutionary 
> theory itself is more religion than science. Your comments 
> are extremely religious in nature; you've taken unproven 
> theory and portrayed it as the One Truth, condemning all 
> other positions as superstitions and its practitioners as 
> mindless, evil, "hideously perverse" morons instead of caring 
> parents and intelligent human beings. I guess what is most 
> disappointing is that someone who seems to advocate broad 
> thinking could be so narrow minded and spiteful. So much for 
> scientific method and objectivity. This is the "I'm right and 
> you're stupid so shut up" method of argument.
> 
> I apologize to members of this list. This is not the place 
> for non-XML debates and religious fervor (which includes 
> *BOTH* sides of the debate). 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org 
> <http://www.xml.org>, an initiative of OASIS 
> <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> 
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
> 
> 

• Prev by Date: RE: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Next by Date: Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Previous by thread: RE: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Next by thread: RE: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread