[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0

• To: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
• Subject: Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>
• Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 22:57:07 +0200
• Cc: 'XML Developers List' <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <20050818233419.DD71FD6EFD@m...>
• References: <20050818233419.DD71FD6EFD@m...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206)

Michael Kay wrote:
>>Many W3C Working Groups try very hard to minimize any
>>work in response to reviews. 
> 
> I'm sorry that's your perception.

I think Björn is very much aware that in most WGs this is not 
intentional. His list describing the behaviour of groups is, however, 
very much accurate.

IMHO a large part of the problem here is that there are too few checks 
during the Working Draft phase, which puts an enormous strain on Last 
Call, resulting over time in the practice now increasingly common of 
having multiple LCs, or of going to CR then back to LC, or giving up and 
making a Note out of it, etc.

Suggestions on how to improve the process in that regard would be very 
welcome.

-- 
Robin Berjon
   Senior Research Scientist
   Expway, http://expway.com/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: IsWeb 2.0 the new XML?
    • From: Dave Pawson <davep@d...>
  • Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
    • From: Rich Salz <rsalz@d...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: IsWeb 2.0 the new XML?
• Next by Date: Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Previous by thread: Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: IsWeb 2.0 the new XML?
• Next by thread: Re: Avoding a repeat of W3C XSD - was Re: Is Web 2.0 the new XML?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread