[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: SchemaExp

• To: Paul Downey <paul.downey@w...>
• Subject: Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: SchemaExperience Workshop minutes online)
• From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 14:09:38 -0400
• Cc: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>, "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <09da2e2db182c310488b753019e2338c@w...>
• References: <e3a5cb2c05070610191ecca85c@m...> <4921.203.164.53.84.1120931469.squirrel@i...> <1326.203.164.53.84.1120936529.squirrel@i...> <e3a5cb2c05071110226e653f6c@m...> <42D34364.9000401@r...> <e3a5cb2c0507112205283be4d4@m...> <6085538505297f41ab697399a42ca403@w...> <2401.203.164.53.150.1121313738.squirrel@i...> <7e2390be355000ab65b4d18c7758131a@w...> <42D66D5E.6040300@m...> <09da2e2db182c310488b753019e2338c@w...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317)

Paul Downey wrote:

> Agreed, but so are processing instructions and DTDs, and yet some  domains
> choose to exclude them, e.g.:
> 
> http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/BasicProfile-1.1-2004-08 
> -24.html#Disallowed_Constructs
> 

And I'm on record as saying that's a major mistake. But again you're 
confusing different issues. restricting the syntactic constructs allowed 
in a particular application has nothing to do with what constraints a 
schema language can express on the structures of documents.

-- 
Elliotte Rusty Harold  elharo@m...
XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published!
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema Experience Workshop minutes online)
    • From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>

• References:
  • Schema Experience Workshop minutes online
    • From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>
  • Can Blind Freddy see a pattern here? (was Re: Schema
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema Experience Workshop minutes online)
    • From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>
  • Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: SchemaExperience Workshop minutes online)
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
  • Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema Experience Workshop minutes online)
    • From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>
  • Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema Experience Workshop minutes online)
    • From: Paul Downey <paul.downey@w...>
  • Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re:
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema Experience Workshop minutes online)
    • From: Paul Downey <paul.downey@w...>
  • Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: SchemaExperience Workshop minutes online)
    • From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema Experience Workshop minutes online)
    • From: Paul Downey <paul.downey@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema Experience Workshop minutes online)
• Next by Date: Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re:
• Previous by thread: Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema Experience Workshop minutes online)
• Next by thread: Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema Experience Workshop minutes online)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread