• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: Interesting pair of comments (was Re:
• Subject: RE: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema Experience Workshop minutes online)
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 13:17:47 +1000 (EST)
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D104D0CD1C@R... osoft.com>
• References: <e3a5cb2c05070610191ecca85c@m...> <4921.203.164.53.84.1120931469.squirrel@i...> <1326.203.164.53.84.1120936529.squirrel@i...> <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D104D0CD1C@R...>
• User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2

> Data binding tools use schemas for type information so you could say they
> use them for PSVI [in a way] but not validation. Many of the interop
> problems are of the form "my tool can bind to schemas with construct X
> while my business partner's can't". A real world example of this is trying
> to send nillable types back and forth between Java and .NET XML Web
> Service toolkits.

It is a funny question isn't it:  can you have a PSVI when you have not
validated?

It's in the lax/strict ballpark I guess...you decide a priori that the
document is valid. Is that the distinguishing feature that needs to be
accommodated?  No Schema Validation Infoset (NSVI)?

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema Experience Workshop minutes online)
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>

• References:
  • Schema Experience Workshop minutes online
    • From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>
  • Can Blind Freddy see a pattern here? (was Re: Schema
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • RE: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema Experience Workshop minutes online)
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema Experience Workshop minutes online)
• Next by Date: Re: Idea - std. non-flat <g><e/></g> syntax
• Previous by thread: RE: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema Experience Workshop minutes online)
• Next by thread: Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema Experience Workshop minutes online)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread