• To: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@g...>
• Subject: Re: Idea - std. non-flat <g><e/></g> syntax
• From: bill palmer <palmer@e...>
• Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 17:26:25 -0500
• Cc: "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• References: <42CF2B25.88A668F4@e...> <cc159a4a05071020321c5ba644@m...> <42D21566.22401AAC@e...> <cc159a4a05071107167d837b59@m...>

>>Umm, I think you missed the point: you don't need any of this, you can
already do this (and far more) using XSLT. Eg, you can reference
(include) an XSLT from a document, you can add in-line XSLT to a
document as a (semi-proprietary) macro format, or add a "document" to
an XSLT stylesheet as a variable (or include)....<<

That sounds promising. The whole idea is that attribute heavy flat xml has an
obvious normalization that I want to accomplish using the <g><e/></g> reformatting
... by the simplest most obvious means possible.

This leads me to ask ...using the <record> elements in my original example...
can you show some actual XSLT markup supporting this line of thinking?


regards,

bill p

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Idea - std. non-flat <g><e/></g> syntax
    • From: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@g...>
  • Re: Idea - std. non-flat <g><e/></g> syntax
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>

• References:
  • Idea - std. non-flat <g><e/></g> syntax
    • From: bill palmer <palmer@e...>
  • Re: Idea - std. non-flat <g><e/></g> syntax
    • From: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@g...>
  • Re: Idea - std. non-flat <g><e/></g> syntax
    • From: bill palmer <palmer@e...>
  • Re: Idea - std. non-flat <g><e/></g> syntax
    • From: Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsberger@g...>

• Prev by Date: RE: grammar cache and xs:redefine
• Next by Date: Re: Idea - std. non-flat <g><e/></g> syntax
• Previous by thread: Re: Idea - std. non-flat <g><e/></g> syntax
• Next by thread: Re: Idea - std. non-flat <g><e/></g> syntax
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread