• To: "Christopher R. Maden" <crism@m...>
• Subject: Re: grammar cache and xs:redefine
• From: Jeff Rafter <lists@j...>
• Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 10:36:59 -0700
• Cc: Tom Moog <tmoog@s...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <42090.64.81.62.48.1121189274.squirrel@w...>
• References: <6.2.1.2.0.20050708085046.03a35f18@l...> <20050712152022.GB24786@w...> <42D3F584.5060606@s...> <42090.64.81.62.48.1121189274.squirrel@w...>
• Reply-to: lists@j...
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206)

> But in that case,
> having three variants is going to give you problems anyhow.

I agree, this isn't a problem that is germane only to xs:redefine-- the 
same conflicts occur with any global component that has the same name. 
Additionally, if using type substitution instead you would still need 
the ability to disambiguate to know which set of types applied (from B1 
or B2).


Cheers,
Jeff Rafter

• References:
  • css syntax - easy question
    • From: Laura Kertz <kertz@l...>
  • Re: css syntax - easy question
    • From: Liam Quin <liam@w...>
  • grammar cache and xs:redefine
    • From: Tom Moog <tmoog@s...>
  • Re: grammar cache and xs:redefine
    • From: "Christopher R. Maden" <crism@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: grammar cache and xs:redefine
• Next by Date: RE: grammar cache and xs:redefine
• Previous by thread: Re: grammar cache and xs:redefine
• Next by thread: RE: grammar cache and xs:redefine
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread