Re: Why XML for Messaging?
> and other nits are elaborated, but at the end, the same > answer 'because it is there' or 'there are no attractive > alternatives' are given. Laziness or just momentum? "There are no attractive alternatives" holds most true, I suspect. Laziness maybe of folks to come up with something thats actually better, if anything. >That XML will be replaced eventually > is almost certain given it's inefficiencies for this > particular application. How about "the *use* of XML will be replaced eventually..." XML is about far more than messaging. > o A simpler XML? Other than schema, could it get much simplier, really? > o A smarter XML? That I agree with. > o Binary XML And that's more simple? > o Objects Wait, I thought this was a conversation about messaging, not about sending serialized object graphs. You'd do one or the other, not both. At least I would. Others would too. Thanks! Kent Tegels DevelopMentor Blog: http://staff.develop.com/ktegels
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format