RE: Why XML for Messaging?
Thanks. I thought that was what you meant. It isn't about the binary or FastInfoset; it is playing nice. That's good too. Where we thee or me have to be careful is making claims for the standards that lead to RFPs that can't be implemented. As one or the original 'wall to wall' believers, I have to accept guilt for that too, but I also have to face up to the facts of performance. When we were mostly docWonks, this wasn't a problem but now that we have MOM and MOM's kitchen is on fire, it is and I do. Goldfarb warned me about this years ago, and once again, the Doctor was right. Benchmark the performance of web services down to the edges. Asynchronicity is not an excuse for failing to get the mail on time. What this means is as Derek and others suggest: we bid different formats at the edges and we may or may not use XML machinery for those. As we get away from real time, we can convert, but even then, we ought to look at the lifecycle and inquire if this is useful. len From: Chiusano Joseph [mailto:chiusano_joseph@b...] Here's the most recent of a series of announcements since the agreement
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format