[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Why XML for Messaging?

Re:  Why XML for Messaging?
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 01:54:27PM -0500, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> Now that's the bid.  Still, no one has answered why I need 
> pointy brackets for that given comma-delimited ascii worked 
> just as well and is smaller.
It's not self-describing? (unless you have headers and then you
have to separate them from the data)....
It doesn't handle sub-structure?  Most database dumnps don't need
substructure, though...
There are better tools for handling XML, both at API level and
at user/data level?

Interoperability means being general, means being less specific,
means in general not being the best for the job at hand, but
good enough, but good enough for lots of jobs is sometimes
better than perfect for only one job.


Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.