[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: ISO 11179

ebxml iso 11179
|  Please, any commentaries on ISO 11179 usage either for or against. 
|  Bryan Rasmussen

I work on a project which uses the UBL Naming & Design Rules. Those are
based on the ebXML CCTS, which in turn is based on ISO 11179 (which as such
does not contain anything about XML). So I need to read and understand:

ISO 11179 Part 1 - 32 pages
ISO 11179 Part 2 - 16 pages
ISO 11179 Part 3 - 108 pages
ISO 11179 Part 4 - 16 pages
ISO 11179 Part 5 - 20 pages
ISO 11179 Part 6 - 72 pages
ebXML Core Components Technical Specification - 113 pages
UBL Naming & Design Rules - 104 pages

So I have one critique: bloat.


(Now, I could count the pages for this other project where I have to
understand XML + XSD + SOAP + WSDL + WS-Security + WS-Reliability + ... ,
come to think of it, the naming stuff above might not be that bad at all :-)

  • References:


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.