RE: ISO 11179
| Please, any commentaries on ISO 11179 usage either for or against. | | Bryan Rasmussen I work on a project which uses the UBL Naming & Design Rules. Those are based on the ebXML CCTS, which in turn is based on ISO 11179 (which as such does not contain anything about XML). So I need to read and understand: ISO 11179 Part 1 - 32 pages ISO 11179 Part 2 - 16 pages ISO 11179 Part 3 - 108 pages ISO 11179 Part 4 - 16 pages ISO 11179 Part 5 - 20 pages ISO 11179 Part 6 - 72 pages ebXML Core Components Technical Specification - 113 pages UBL Naming & Design Rules - 104 pages So I have one critique: bloat. Marc (Now, I could count the pages for this other project where I have to understand XML + XSD + SOAP + WSDL + WS-Security + WS-Reliability + ... , come to think of it, the naming stuff above might not be that bad at all :-)
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format