Re: Another Microsoft XML patent
* Kurt Cagle <kurt.cagle@g...> [2005-06-06 17:30]: > > We spend x billion a year on research and development. How can > > you tell us that our application approval pivots on the consesus > > of a newsgroup. > Not the CONSENSUS of a newsgroup ... only its ability to provide > DISCOVERY. The decision is still, ultimately, in the hands of the > patent arbiter. All that opening up this process would do is to insure > that if prior art existed that it could be brought forth through a > normal discovery process. This is done by the W3C all the time when > they are attempting to insure that the patents that they are filing do > not infringe existing patents. Yes, yes. But, don't you just know the press release is going to say it? The huge patent portfolios of the large corporations are such that the patents lend validity to each other. The well funded research departments lend validity to the patents they produce. I can hear it now. We spend so much money on this, we fuel innovation, we take risks, we don't want our competitors influencing the patent approval process. The money spent on research is how big phrama justifies its patents on medicine, even when lives depend on that medicine to be generic, they argue that the innovation of new medicine requires patent protection. Brace yourself for similiar arguments from big software, as specious as they may be when applied to software. -- Alan Gutierrez - alan@e... - http://engrm.com/blogometer/index.html - http://engrm.com/blogometer/rss.2.0.xml
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format