RE: Processing XML 1.1 documents with XML Schema 1.0 processor
Yeah, but that's nothing compared to what we have planned for the spec editors. len From: Elliotte Harold [mailto:elharo@m...] Robin Berjon wrote: > Of all people *we* should know that the encoding of text on a global > scale is not a static science, it evolves and needs to evolve as Unicode > improves. Yes this implies a phase during which XML processors may lose > some interoperability, but whoever puts XML interoperability above human > language operability needs to have their priorities seriously revised. > Yes this may break software that is making stupid assumptions about the > content of certain tokens, but such software was written based on a > misunderstanding of text and deserves to break (and then to be shot in > the kneecaps, tied to a horse and dragged all around town, dipped in > boiling lead, dismembered piece by piece with a rusty spoon, and finally > dumped in a ditch to agonize). That's a pretty harsh punishment for actually implementing the specs as written.
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format