Re: Processing XML 1.1 documents with XML Schema 1.0 processor
Eric van der Vlist wrote: > If the intent is different from what's written, that should be published > as an errata. Leaving it to the appreciation of the readers would likely > provoke interoperability nightmares! In a committee written spec, different authors, editors, and reviewers may all have different "intent" for the same language. Indeed even a single author may have had different intent at different times. It's entirely possible that some working group members intended the spec to refer to the most current versions and some intended it to specifically refer to XML 1.0 and not subsequent versions. This is yet another reason why normative test suites are really, really important for specifications of this nature. -- Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@m... XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published! http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/ http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format