[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Something altogether different?

• To: 'Michael Champion' <michaelc.champion@g...>, Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@d...>
• Subject: RE: Something altogether different?
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 12:34:15 -0500
• Cc: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>

Just map the vector model vectors to the URIs and 
replicate them.  Not a very hard problem as long as 
the index types can be published.  Basically it's the 
semantic web simplified by taking the schemas and 
giving them a vector, taking the same from the 
unstructured texts and mapping them.

The real fun begins in a multi-variate document such 
as an aggregate where the sets of the single namespace 
become a term in the higher level space but that is 
all aggregation is anyway.  More fun comes when you 
begin to treat non-text datasources such as audio 
and video as if they were texts and impose namespaces 
onto these and induce intent.

len


From: Michael Champion [mailto:michaelc.champion@g...]

Thanks, I was hoping someone would start a thread about that!  I have
found a link to (perhaps some earlier version of) the presentation
itself http://www.webratio.com/images/20050408Bosworth.pps

I'm still digesting all this ... certainly my first reaction was that
somehow putting web services and XQuery in the same category, and
setting up RSS 2 as their antithesis, is stretching my mind in places
it doesn't want to stretch :-)

• Prev by Date: Re: Something altogether different?
• Next by Date: Re: Something altogether different?
• Previous by thread: Re: Something altogether different?
• Next by thread: RE: Something altogether different?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread