Re: Re: Language Theorie concerning XML Schema (heavy,atleast
Bob Foster writes: > Hmm. XercesJ reports three errors (not warnings) from this schema of > the form: > > Error - src-resolve: Cannot resolve the name 'unknownX' to a(n) 'type > definition' component. > > Where X is one of: 1, 2, 3; How did you invoke Xerces? I'm not a Xerces user, but I am pretty sure the REC says that instance is schema valid per the schema corresponding to that schema doc. It's also true that that schema is not 'complete' or 'self-contained', but it's not broken as such. The REC is very clear that dangling references that aren't needed for validation are not an error. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@i... URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format