• To: "'Bornholtz, Tim'" <Tim.Bornholtz@e...>, "M. David Peterson" <m.david.x2x2x@g...>
• Subject: RE: Rigged Aggregators?
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 13:09:02 -0600
• Cc: Bill Kearney <wkearney@s...>, "xml-dev@lists. xml. org" <xml-dev@l...>

I think that is Godwin's Law but nevermind.

http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/legends/godwin/

If there is no technical basis for the claims made, there is 
no case to be made for the claims of commission regardless of 
agency.   If there is a technical basis, then the claims made 
of commission are an entirely different issue from that of 
recommending technical changes that limit abuse.  If such 
recommendations are credible they inform the legislation 
created to detect or prevent commissions of abuse.

That should be clear to even the most ardent supporter 
or detractor of the accused.

The Godwin gambit is refused.

len


From: Bornholtz, Tim [mailto:Tim.Bornholtz@e...]

Oh please!!!

Will someone just call someone else a Nazi so we can invoke Goodwin's law
and call this thread dead?!?!?

• Prev by Date: Re: Rigged Aggregators?
• Next by Date: RE: Rigged Aggregators?
• Previous by thread: RE: Rigged Aggregators?
• Next by thread: Cannot have multiple DOCTYPE declarations
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread