• To: XML Developers List <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Is there a way to reuse and extend an enumeration in XML schema
• From: Kenneth Stephen <marvin.the.paranoid@g...>
• Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 20:03:11 -0600
• Cc: Chiusano Joseph <chiusano_joseph@b...>
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=iKSm+w8e4Tzv3NkUxpVvCIKgXQKu4Lc/l5jw1mQkbRJyaShx5LbM10bgGtiwufM7tkMkhZZ92YQSJJKRpt6R1Ts1+22dHJ4SxHER+lxvfBLzE/39VUejxmLG4va38rFn8GZQZnq/Y1CtL14fnR4ZODdadtiALsy7i/YKJGzwyTk=
• In-reply-to: <74B14CBC0FEB9D4EB16969F09FA51F4533442F@M...>
• References: <74B14CBC0FEB9D4EB16969F09FA51F4533442F@M...>
• Reply-to: Kenneth Stephen <marvin.the.paranoid@g...>

Joseph,

    Your assumptions about my original question were correct. However,
the resulting discussion that has arisen in this thread is of equal
interest to me.

Thanks,
Kenneth


On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 11:47:21 -0500, Chiusano Joseph
<chiusano_joseph@b...> wrote:
> I took the reference to "without altering the original definition" as
> referring to the definition of the simple type (the "A", "B", and "C"
> choices) - in which case the solution I proposed would meet that
> requirement. But I agree that it is unclear as to whether the original
> poster intended *any* definition, in which case I would ask that they
> clarify.
>

• References:
  • RE: Is there a way to reuse and extend an enumeration in XML schema
    • From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>

• Prev by Date: Is there a schema?
• Next by Date: Re: Composite constraints
• Previous by thread: RE: Is there a way to reuse and extend an enumeration in XML schema
• Next by thread: RE: Is there a way to reuse and extend an enumeration in XML schema
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread