• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: xml on a chip....
• From: David Lyon <david.lyon@c...>
• Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:23:20 -0500
• In-reply-to: <002801c529ab$72bca800$131010ac@aldebaran>
• References: <C4EEF1F8830AB24A8BE3A3C9E9C85792470FAB@i...> <200503160757.04347.david.lyon@c...> <002801c529ab$72bca800$131010ac@aldebaran>
• User-agent: KMail/1.7.1

On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 5:07 pm, Philip Nye wrote:
> XML for what?
>
> I work on small embedded applications a lot, and also on XML which
> certainly has a place, but such processors generally have a fairly specific
> application and are likely to work with one dedicated schema. Optimising
> the XML processing to a particular schema in resource challenged
> applications is certainly interesting.
>
> Processing full blooded and open ended XML when you only have one or two
> kilobytes of RAM is not really feasible. 

Depends on the exact processor. Some of these chips have 128k and more
which is easily enough to do quite a lot...

> Serving up an XML document 
> (largely from ROM) for some better resourced processor to interpret is
> definitely happening.

it's interesting...

-- 
Computergrid : The ones with the most connections win.

• References:
  • Premier European XML Industry Event Expands Focus to "XML, the Web and Beyond";
    • From: "Elledge, Marion" <MElledge@i...>
  • xml on a chip....
    • From: David Lyon <david.lyon@c...>
  • Re: xml on a chip....
    • From: "Philip Nye" <philip@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: xml on a chip....
• Next by Date: RE: XRules: Mind your own business rules
• Previous by thread: Re: xml on a chip....
• Next by thread: Re: xml on a chip....
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread