• To: 'sterling' <sstouden@t...>
• Subject: RE: Aggregated content, fact checking, PICS, Atom/RSS (was Rigged Aggregators)
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 10:38:13 -0600
• Cc: "xml-dev@lists. xml. org" <xml-dev@l...>

Here's an example of someone (edd) who implements a rating system 
that determines how much attention he pays to say, xml-dev.

http://pants.heddley.com/2001/03/28/2001-03-28.html

See "So here's an idea".  It perfectly expresses a means, 
a value and the intent of the means relative to the value. 
That value was then published widely and those that shared 
the intent for ascertaining it could use it as guidance.  
That is how the web works. However, it means that over time, 
the web is never apolitical; just multi-polied.  

len

• Prev by Date: RE: Aggregated content, fact checking, PICS, Atom/RSS (was Rigged Aggregators)
• Next by Date: XTECH 2005 - News Summit, OASIS Open Standards Day -additional discounts available now!
• Previous by thread: RE: Aggregated content, fact checking, PICS, Atom/RSS (was Rigged Aggregators)
• Next by thread: RE: Aggregated content, fact checking, PICS, Atom/RSS (was Rigged Aggregators)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread