• To: Doug Rudder <drudder@d...>
• Subject: Re: XML Schema is not yet widespread??
• From: Paul Downey <paul.downey@w...>
• Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 20:28:06 +0000
• Cc: 'Chiusano Joseph' <chiusano_joseph@b...>,Joe Gregorio <joe.gregorio@g...>,xml-dev@l...,Adi Eio <adieio@g...>
• In-reply-to: <B2E776DBE74D76439BA590B9C12F844F010FDCC1@FACAPPS1>
• References: <B2E776DBE74D76439BA590B9C12F844F010FDCC1@FACAPPS1>

On 16 Mar 2005, at 19:31, Doug Rudder wrote:

> I believe the thread started 11/01/2004 and was titled "Number of 
> active public XML schemas".

archived here:

http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200411/threads.html#00006

--
http://blog.whatfettle.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML Schema is not yet widespread??
    • From: Joe Gregorio <joe.gregorio@g...>

• References:
  • RE: XML Schema is not yet widespread??
    • From: Doug Rudder <drudder@d...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML Schema is not yet widespread??
• Next by Date: XML/XSD/XML Tools
• Previous by thread: RE: XML Schema is not yet widespread??
• Next by thread: Re: XML Schema is not yet widespread??
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread