• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Tamino status
• From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
• Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 22:35:16 -0800
• In-reply-to: <E1D7LKH-0001yu-00@u...>
• References: <E1D7LKH-0001yu-00@u...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)

I wasn't going to tip my hand but ... keep your eyes on XML.com. I spent 
a good part of the last year surveying native XML database companies 
about real-world use cases and writing an article about the results. 
About half the companies participated, including most of the major 
players. The article should be published sometime in the (near?) future.

The article was interesting for me because, while I have a good handle 
on how native XML databases work technically, I was pretty clueless 
about actual applications. One of the pleasant surprises was the number 
and variety of applications that showed up, especially ones where 
well-known companies were using native XML databases, sometimes in 
mission-critical applications.

-- Ron

Michael Kay wrote:

> I think we'd like to hear
> more detail about successful applications of XML databases (not just Tamino
> of course) and the tasks they are being applied to in practice

• References:
  • RE: Tamino status
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
• Next by Date: fuzzy end of this lolly-pop OR Why Latin Rocks
• Previous by thread: RE: Tamino status
• Next by thread: RE: Schema, BNF and parsing
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread