• To: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
• Subject: Re: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missingfrom the UCS ?
• From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>
• Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 08:53:17 +1100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <E1D7Kat-0001TJ-00@u...>
• Organization: Zenucom Pty Ltd
• References: <E1D7Kat-0001TJ-00@u...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (X11/20040502)

Michael Kay wrote:

>my suggestion would be a-z 
>
>wh nds vwls?
>
>MHK
>
>
>
>!DSPAM:4228d6b6205701820420276!
>
>  
>
ntrstng pnt

persnlly i find usng the first vowl only maks the sentnce mor redbl

is y a vowl? and we probbly dont ned h ethr

begin:vcard
fn:Rick  Marshall
n:Marshall;Rick 
email;internet:rjm@z...
tel;cell:+61 411 287 530
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard

• References:
  • RE: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
• Next by Date: RE: Tamino status
• Previous by thread: RE: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
• Next by thread: Re: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT ismissing from the UCS ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread