[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XQuery Adoption Survey Results

• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: XQuery Adoption Survey Results
• From: Tony Lavinio <xml1@l...>
• Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 13:00:09 -0500
• Cc: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
• In-reply-to: <424A4538.2070801@r...>
• Organization: Stylus Studio
• References: <4249839F.7020003@l...> <e3a5cb2c0503291305240ca0e@m...> <424A3095.1000801@l...> <424A4538.2070801@r...>
• Reply-to: stylusstudio@s...
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

We agree then.  The world has changed a lot in two years - especially
for the XQuery specification!  But no one can think about a software
purchase today without considering XML, which wasn't true even two or
three years ago.

On 03-30-2005 1:20 AM, Ronald Bourret wrote:
> Either my 
> sample is biased, Evans' sample is biased, or the world has changed a 
> lot in two years.

-- 
Sincerely,
Tony Lavinio
Stylus Studio Principal Software Architect
http://www.stylusstudio.com/

• References:
  • XQuery Adoption Survey Results
    • From: Tony Lavinio <xml1@l...>
  • Re: XQuery Adoption Survey Results
    • From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>
  • Re: XQuery Adoption Survey Results
    • From: Tony Lavinio <xml1@l...>
  • Re: XQuery Adoption Survey Results
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>

• Prev by Date: RE: What Does SOAP/WS Do that A REST System Can't?
• Next by Date: Re: What Does SOAP/WS Do that A REST System Can't?
• Previous by thread: Re: XQuery Adoption Survey Results
• Next by thread: Re: XQuery Adoption Survey Results
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread