• To: Adi Eio <adieio@g...>
• Subject: Re: XML Schema is not yet widespread??
• From: Joe Gregorio <joe.gregorio@g...>
• Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:29:47 -0500
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=Z9LoVSoskdQwyRGF9kLb7743zQrNITAWC94LVyziXWgN6DHL16hA6aAl9EuPaFReLNr4JVXRf1V1bsmxQsZ+a+0Y4DtlnsWJaVzw3J86U1HFf90CAE87D5nfpHFj931GOyS+CMsovyIkBRPeDo83Oqb0c5RXgV+HnffpH7XkO+s=
• In-reply-to: <bfe0d99605031605081522fee3@m...>
• References: <bfe0d99605031605081522fee3@m...>
• Reply-to: Joe Gregorio <joe.gregorio@g...>

On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:08:44 +0000, Adi Eio <adieio@g...> wrote:
> Hi
> I was wandering to how can I know the current extent of XML Schema on
> the Web. Because I saw a paper by Mignet et al (2003), that say:
> "conceptual schemas on the XML Web is not yet widespread: only 48% of
> the documents reference DTDs while the number of documents that
> reference XML Schema specifications is insignificant (0.09% of all
> documents)."

Is that % of all instances of documents in the wild, or a % of types
of documents
in the wild? If it is the former, I would not be suprised at that
number given that
the internet is awash in RSS files, for which there will never be a schema.

   -joe

-- 
Joe Gregorio        http://bitworking.org

• References:
  • XML Schema is not yet widespread??
    • From: Adi Eio <adieio@g...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Aggregated content, fact checking, PICS, Atom/RSS ( was Rigged Aggregators)
• Next by Date: Re: Advanced XML Schema Training Class?
• Previous by thread: Re: XML Schema is not yet widespread??
• Next by thread: RE: XML Schema is not yet widespread??
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread