• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
• From: "Paul Spencer" <xml-dev@b...>
• Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 12:14:02 -0000
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <200503042235.05201.david.lyon@c...>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Lyon [mailto:david.lyon@c...]
> Sent: 05 March 2005 03:35
> To: Bob Foster
> Cc: xml-dev@l...
> Subject: Re:  [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is
> missing from the UCS ?
> 
> 
> In any case, functionality in data representation is way more important
> than cosmetics.

Tell that to Joan Collins.

• References:
  • Re: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
    • From: David Lyon <david.lyon@c...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Do I need XML parser ?
• Next by Date: Re: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
• Previous by thread: Re: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
• Next by thread: Re: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread