[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: Article on

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
• From: David Lyon <david.lyon@c...>
• Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 11:26:18 -0500
• Cc: Prakash Yamuna <techpy@y...>
• In-reply-to: <20050218235529.34332.qmail@w...>
• References: <20050218235529.34332.qmail@w...>
• User-agent: KMail/1.7.1

On Friday 18 February 2005 06:55 pm, Prakash Yamuna wrote:

> But I always end up with a feeling that there must be
> better way for things to evolve. The current approach
> of "CAN'T TOUCH INTERFACES" - is I feel flawed - how
> do you evolve in such an environment?

Who said that?

The only people I recall saying that were the U.S based
venture capitalists about two years ago. Obviously they
control the purse strings of the development communities
and their imaginations...

As I recall they got together and decided that they would not
be any major new developments in the years to come.

All I can say is what a load of B.S.

Computers at the moment are nowhere near as interoperable
as they could be.

Email and IM have been great. But I doubt they are the
final word in computer-computer communications.

I would like to hazzard some guesses and think that there
is much much better that can be done... 

especially with xml.. I don't believe that the xml is anywhere
near the rev limit just yet...


-- 
Computergrid : The ones with the most connections win.

• References:
  • RE: Re: What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
    • From: Prakash Yamuna <techpy@y...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Re: What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
• Next by Date: RE: Re: What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
• Previous by thread: RE: Re: What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
• Next by thread: RE: Re: What should TrAX look like? (Was: Re: Article on JAXP 1.3 "Fast and Easy XML Processing")
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread