|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Substitution Groups
"Michael Kay" <mike@s...> writes: >> >> You gloss is not accurate. The REC also says, wrt the semantics of >> <import> [1], > > We had a discussion on this on xmlschema-dev in October and I thought the > conclusion was that 3.15.3 was indeed flawed. > > If document A includes document B (or if C includes A and B), the components > defined in A are never added to the "appropriate property of the schema > which corresponds to the document B", and under 3.15.3 they are therefore > not available to discharge QName references in B. Sorry, I was confused by the context, which was Paul Spencer's <import> example. You're right, the impact of need for laziness has not always made it to ever corner of the spec. that it needs to -- we're working on getting composition right in XML Schema 1.1. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@i... URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||






