[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?

• To: Michael Kay <mike@s...>
• Subject: Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
• From: Rick Marshall <rjm@z...>
• Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 10:50:34 +1100
• Cc: "'David Lyon'" <david.lyon@c...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <E1CwqMU-0006Kn-00@u...>
• Organization: Zenucom Pty Ltd
• References: <E1CwqMU-0006Kn-00@u...>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (X11/20040502)

Michael Kay wrote:

>>I can see your point. I guess they chose the less and greater than
>>characters because they look a bit smoother on the screen 
>>    
>>
>
>Screen? We're talking about the 1960s.
>  
>
the selectric was a bit short on characters (so were the early line 
printers) we used ( - overstruck for { in our early c work.

>Michael Kay
>http://www.saxonica.com/
>
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
>initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
>
>The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
>manager: <http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/index.php>
>
>
>!DSPAM:4202b3a9214625793919560!
>
>  
>

begin:vcard
fn:Rick  Marshall
n:Marshall;Rick 
email;internet:rjm@z...
tel;cell:+61 411 287 530
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
version:2.1
end:vcard

• References:
  • RE: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
• Next by Date: Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
• Previous by thread: RE: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
• Next by thread: Re: xml 2.0 - so it's on the way after all?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread