[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Unqualified Element without using xs:any

• To: "'Don Hillsberry'" <don_hillsberry@h...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Unqualified Element without using xs:any
• From: "Priscilla Walmsley" <priscilla@w...>
• Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 23:33:47 -0500
• In-reply-to: <BAY102-F26FD79BE4BEB605A3A039DF9740@p...>
• Organization: Datypic
• Thread-index: AcUNeTTr2HbeIT6WTRGIFWM1kScMIQAHViUg

Hi Don,

If you have elementFormDefault="unqualified" in your B schema document, then
it looks like a bug in XMLSpy.  I tested my schemas with your instance using
both Xerces-J 2.6.2 and XSV, and it validated correctly.

Hope that helps,
Priscilla

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Don Hillsberry [mailto:don_hillsberry@h...] 
> Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 7:55 PM
> To: priscilla@w...; xml-dev@l...
> Subject: RE:  Unqualified Element without using xs:any
> 
> Priscilla,
> Thanks for your quick response...
> 
> The example you provided was the third attempt I had made 
> when trying to 
> solve this problem.
> However, validating the instance document with XMLSpy 5.4 
> results in a 
> validation error "Mandatory element 'bbb:C' expected in place of 'C'"
> 
> I am new to XML Schema validation, so I tried to research and 
> identify the 
> reason for error.  Assuming that I'm not dealing with a bug 
> in XMLSpy, the 
> closest I could get to an explaination had to do with the 
> targetNamespace 
> attribute in the "B" schema and the corresponding import with 
> namespace 
> attribute in the "A" schema.
> Attempting to avoid this, is when I arrived at the only 
> working solution I 
> have found, the "xs:any"
> However, "xs:any" causes issues downstream since this schema 
> is being used 
> by another comercial product that is unable to properly 
> handle the "xs:any".
> 
> Is the <import namespace="urn:b" .../>  putting the local 
> definitions of "C" 
> and "D" into the urn:b namepsace?
> 
> If not, is there an explaination for this validation error 
> other than a bug 
> in XMLSpy?
> 
> What are your thoughts?
> 
> -
> Don
> 
> 
> 

• References:
  • RE: Unqualified Element without using xs:any
    • From: "Don Hillsberry" <don_hillsberry@h...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Bounce messages from AdventureMail.com
• Next by Date: Re: Re: Where does the "nothing left but toolkits" mythcome from?
• Previous by thread: Re: Unqualified Element without using xs:any
• Next by thread: Bounce messages from AdventureMail.com
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread