[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Data streams

• To: david.lyon@c...
• Subject: Re: Data streams
• From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>
• Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 16:16:25 -0800
• Cc: "Stephen E. Beller" <sbeller@n...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <1102375165.41b4e8fd15fb5@65.39.203.11>
• References: <00cd01c4dbbe$8c3ca3b0$6501a8c0@dell8100> <1102375165.41b4e8fd15fb5@65.39.203.11>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

david.lyon@c... wrote:
>>The XML file was 840MB, the CSV 34MB -- a 2,500% difference
>>Compressed, the XML file was 2.5MB, the CSV 0.00015MB (150KB) -- a 1,670%
>>difference.
> Put another way, the compressed xml file was 2.5MB and the
> CSV file was 34MB.
> 
> Therefore, sending compressed XML data is more efficient
> than using CSV and requires less resources to transmit
> and send.

Put another way, the compressed xml file was 2.5MB and the compressed 
CSV file was 150KB.

Therefore, sending compressed CSV is more efficient than sending 
compressed XML and requires fewer resources to transmit and send.

Bob Foster

• References:
  • RE: Data streams
    • From: "Stephen E. Beller" <sbeller@n...>
  • RE: Data streams
    • From: david.lyon@c...

• Prev by Date: Re: Data streams
• Next by Date: Re: Data streams
• Previous by thread: RE: Data streams
• Next by thread: Re: Data streams
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread