[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: Streaming XML (WAS: More on taming SAX (was Re: [xml-d

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: Streaming XML (WAS: More on taming SAX (was Re: ANN: Amara XML Toolkit 0.9.0))
• From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>
• Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 21:54:29 +0000
• In-reply-to: <1104441548.1677.1.camel@borgia>
• References: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D10276723C@R...> <cqsvbp$fbi$1@s...> <1104441548.1677.1.camel@borgia>
• Sender: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>
• User-agent: KMail/1.6.2

Uche Ogbuji wrote,
> SAX says nothing that prevents temporally simultaneous events.

If it doesn't that's a bug in the docs and should be fixed.

The runtime nesting of SAX event callbacks mirrors the structure of the 
real or virtual document being parsed. Simultaneous events would imply 
superimposed nodes ... which ain't possible.

But I don't need to tell you that ... sorry to quibble with your 
rhetorical flourish ;-)

Cheers,


Miles

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Re: Streaming XML (WAS: More on taming SAX (was Re: ANN: Amara XML Toolkit 0.9.0))
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>

• References:
  • RE: Streaming XML (WAS: More on taming SAX (was Re: ANN: Amara XML Toolkit 0.9.0))
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
  • Re: Streaming XML (WAS: More on taming SAX (was Re: ANN: Amara XML Toolkit 0.9.0))
    • From: "Dimitre Novatchev" <dnovatchev@y...>
  • Re: Re: Streaming XML (WAS: More on taming SAX (was Re: ANN: Amara XML Toolkit 0.9.0))
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <Uche.Ogbuji@f...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Update (Re: ANN: Amara XML Toolkit 0.9.0)
• Next by Date: Re: XSLT2 - which parts solve real 1.0 problems, which makes coffee? - was Re: Streaming XML
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Streaming XML (WAS: More on taming SAX (was Re: ANN: Amara XML Toolkit 0.9.0))
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Streaming XML (WAS: More on taming SAX (was Re: ANN: Amara XML Toolkit 0.9.0))
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread