[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: performant templating language for XML

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: performant templating language for XML
• From: Kevin Jones <kjouk@y...>
• Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 09:46:26 +0000
• Cc: "Nathan Young" <natyoung@c...>
• In-reply-to: <opsjqqb6d0tk791m@mailman>
• References: <opsjqqb6d0tk791m@mailman>
• Reply-to: kjouk@y...
• User-agent: KMail/1.6.2

On Tuesday 28 December 2004 23:03, Nathan Young wrote:
> Initial tests seem to show that XSL is a no-go in the
> load environment   outlined above. Does anyone have
> production experience that would argue that XSL can be
> viable at these rates and that we should be looking
> harder for optimization strategies?

It's hard to be conclusive from the data you have given but 
your input document size is small enough not to be of any 
real concern. My experience with similar installations 
would suggest that unless you are doing something very 
complex this should be achievable in XSLT. 

Perhaps you could post a sample here or to the XSLT list. 
The main commercial XSLT vendors will also generally offer 
to run a benchmark test for you which is a handy way to 
gauge what is possible.

Kev.

• References:
  • performant templating language for XML
    • From: "Nathan Young" <natyoung@c...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Streaming XML (WAS: More on taming SAX (was Re: ANN: Amara XML Toolkit 0.9.0))
• Next by Date: Re: Streaming XML (WAS: More on taming SAX (was Re: ANN: Amara XML Toolkit 0.9.0))
• Previous by thread: Re: performant templating language for XML
• Next by thread: Re: performant templating language for XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread