|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Streaming XML (WAS: More on taming SAX (was Re: [xm
Alan, > There are reasons for programming besides personal intereset > and fun? Explain. :-) > I can't see where I'm supposed to put logic that invokes Java > reflection in the above statement. The external logic might go into the external function. > Now I have to write a huge > switch statement explictly in my:function, or implicitly in the > XQuery file. Yes, but by writing it this way you make your application: (a) much simpler and (b) robust to changes > Like I said. I didn't want the document. I wanted the parser. > > I don't want to generate a document, I want to generate action. I understand. That' why I proposed you to use only the searching/pattern part of XQuery, and use external functions for the action. I guess the same can be said about XSLT. XQuery's goal is not *only* to generate XML documents, it's only a part of the game. Best regards, Dana
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








