[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Is "(//c)[a]" valid in Xpath 1.0?

• To: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• Subject: Re: Is "(//c)[a]" valid in Xpath 1.0?
• From: Oleg Paraschenko <usenet@d...>
• Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 18:40:27 +0300
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <200411121151.LAA09169@p...>
• Organization: DataHansa Software
• References: <20041112143439.13ea83a0.usenet@d...><200411121151.LAA09169@p...>

  Hello David,

On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 11:51:14 GMT
David Carlisle <davidc@n...> wrote:

...
> 
> yes, yes.
> 
> production [15] says a parenthesized expression is a PrimaryExpr
> production  [20] says a FilterExpr is a PrimaryExpr
> optionally followed by a Predicate (which is an Expression surrounded
> by[] by production [8]
> 
> and production [19] says a FilterEXpr is a PathExpr

  Thank you a lot!

> 
> David
> 

-- 
Oleg

• References:
  • Is "(//c)[a]" valid in Xpath 1.0?
    • From: Oleg Paraschenko <usenet@d...>
  • Re: Is "(//c)[a]" valid in Xpath 1.0?
    • From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Invalid tokens
• Next by Date: Re: XML Performance in Client-Server Interactions
• Previous by thread: Re: Is "(//c)[a]" valid in Xpath 1.0?
• Next by thread: Excellent Insight on Standards Development vs Invention
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread