[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Bits vs APIS - was Excellent Insight on StandardsDevelopme

  • To: <davep@d...>
  • Subject: RE: Bits vs APIS - was Excellent Insight on StandardsDevelopment vs Invention
  • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
  • Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 02:14:23 -0800
  • Cc: "Michael Champion" <michaelc.champion@g...>,<xml-dev@l...>
  • Thread-index: AcTKLN++/hHABqtUQjGS618lDnr2qgABda99
  • Thread-topic: Bits vs APIS - was Excellent Insight on StandardsDevelopment vs Invention

atom 0.3 schema
I don't understand your statement. So you're saying that the XSLT for processing the fairly straightforward RSS 0.91/2.0 and RSS 1.0 formats was geting too complex but you were hoping adding a third [actually fourth when you consider Atom 0.3 and Atom 1.0] format which is more complex than either would somehow make things better. 
There is nothing more satisfying that having someone take a shot at you, and miss. 


From: Dave Pawson [mailto:davep@d...]
Sent: Sun 11/14/2004 1:32 AM
To: Dare Obasanjo
Cc: Michael Champion; xml-dev@l...
Subject: RE:  Bits vs APIS - was Excellent Insight on StandardsDevelopment vs Invention

On Sat, 2004-11-13 at 21:46, Dare Obasanjo wrote:

 With RSS 0.91/2.0 & RSS 1.0, a feed consumer could write fairly
straightforward code to parse either format with just a few if...else
blocks to deal with the minor differences (e.g. in RSS 1.0 the <item>
elements are not a child of <channel>). Now with adding Atom 0.3 and
then Atom 1.0 to the mix, it is more likely that a syndication consumer
would just want some API that hides the syntactical variaations of all
the various XML syndication formats instead of dealing with each one
individually using an XML API.

If authors would stick to either of the schema's that would be a valid
statement Dare. By the time I got up to about 10 feeds, the XSLT is
becoming really horrible, and needs to be namespace agnostic.

The number of variations on a theme made reasonable processing with xslt
just about impossible. Hence I was hopeful of a schema for Atom.

Regards DaveP.
XSLT&Docbook  FAQ


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.