Re: Number of active public XML schemas
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 11:36:51AM -0800, Ronald Bourret wrote: [...] > Not sure why people chose DTDs instead of XML Schemas, but I suspect > it's either because they were coming from the SGML world or because they > started work before XML Schemas were a recommendation. Or because they are easier to understand, or because there is wider support for them, or because they are more interoperable, or because books and tutorials on XML usually talk in detail about DTDS, which are, after all, part of the XML Specification, and often omit W3C XML Schemas altogether or give only an overview, as they are too complex to cover in a small (say, under 1,200-page) book in good detail, and in any case the writer may need to devote equal coverage to RelaxNG and Schematron. Wow, was that a sentence? W3C XML Schema support has been growing over the past couple of years, and interoperability seems to me to have been increasing, but I'd still suggest that people use a DTD if it satisfies their needs. Liam -- Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format