|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: binary xml for large collections of structured data?
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 01:56:33PM +1000, cr88192 wrote: > how about xml for xml-like data, but a lot of it?... > eg: GB's of xml, representing things like arbitrary types of serialized > objects, collections, ... We do have some people in the W3C XML Binary Characterization WG who have gigabytes / terabytes of data. Some of them were represented at the public Workshop we held last year -- e.g. geoglogical surveys. You might like to look at the Use Cases document [1] for some of the needs that have come up, and also the first go at a list of properties of binary encodings that one might measure. > so, there could be 2 varieties: > a flat serialized version, which could be simpler and used for read or > write only access; > a dynamic random-access version, which could be more complex, but would > allow read/write access, and possibly tranactional stuff (the log likely > being kept as a seperate file). something like a b-tree could make sense. A b-tree isn't really an interchange format. W3C isn't in the business of specifying what goes on inside a database or application in that way really, only at the interoperability level (although DOM stretches that a little, I admit!). Liam [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xbc-use-cases [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xbc-properties -- Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








