[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: [xml-d

• To: 'Peter Hunsberger' <peter.hunsberger@g...>
• Subject: RE: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Number of active public XML schemas
• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <len.bullard@i...>
• Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:10:54 -0600
• Cc: Jeff Greif <jgreif@a...>, xml-dev@l...

As a means to create a consumable document for others to 
generate instances of say, queries, sure.   The dynamic 
aspects of the generation are merely convenient.   Note 
that VisualStudio.Net autogenerates schemas for datasets.

Good for data dictionary work. 

len


From: Peter Hunsberger [mailto:peter.hunsberger@g...]
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 10:05 AM

On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:00:17 -0600, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
<len.bullard@i...> wrote:

> I won't go quite that far.   I may need to create a schema for
> others to inspect because I don't want to open up an ODBC
> connection for them to my metadata tables.   In that case,
> providing an XML Schema for them to consume or its analog
> (the mammals are relentless reinovators), makes sense.
> I agree that in the environment I work in, modeling in
> XML Schema isn't very useful.

Exactly, that's why I questioned whether an XML schema was ever the
best "model"....  I might have a need for XML schema to travel with
certain instance data, but do I need them otherwise?

• Prev by Date: Re: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Number of active public XML schemas
• Next by Date: Re: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Number of active public XML schemas
• Previous by thread: Re: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Number of active public XML schemas
• Next by thread: RE: dynamically generated XML Schema?! Re: R: Number of active public XML schemas
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread